Thursday, March 22, 2018

The Noamster Comments about Russian Meddling

Interviewer: Which brings us to the narrative of Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election. I understand you’re not very impressed with this line.

Chomsky: Well it’s very hard to take seriously for a number of reasons. One reason is the work of Thomas Ferguson and his colleagues [“How Money Won Trump the White House”]. There really is manipulation of elections, but it’s not coming from the Russians. It’s coming from the people who buy the elections. Take his study of the 2016 election [“Industrial Structure and Party Competition in an Age of Hunger Games: Donald Trump and the 2016 Presidential Election”]. That’s how you interfere with elections. Or the pretty spectacular study that he and his colleagues did about a year ago on Congress “How Money Drives US Congressional Elections,” where you just get a straight line [correlation between money and major party votes in Congress]. You rarely see results like that in the social sciences. That’s massive manipulation. Compared with that, what the Russians might be doing is minuscule. Quite aside from the fact that the U.S. does it all the time in other countries.

No comments:

Post a Comment

One of the objects if this blog is to elevate civil discourse. Please do your part by presenting arguments rather than attacks or unfounded accusations.

Sure, a stopped clock is right twice a day, but could Trump ever be anything but a short-fingered vulgarian?

(c) by Mark Dempsey Harry Truman used to say there's nothing new under the sun, just history you don't know. The history of vulgari...