Friday, February 2, 2018

Local Action Opportunity (from Sierra Club)

The Sacramento Sierra Club Group and Mother Lode Chapter Conservation Committee have been working in conjunction with the Environmental Council of Sacramento, Habitat 2020 and the Friends of Swainsons Hawks in a critical effort to STOP the loss of more farmland, addition of land to the City of Elk Grove which will add to urban sprawl, add to strained water supplies and pollution, and endanger critical habitat.  Please read the following information compiled by the coalition of groups and send comments and/or plan to attend this very important upcoming hearing.


Once again LAFCo (Local Area Formation Agency) is considering adding 1,158 acres of farmland  to Elk Grove's potential urbanization south of the present Elk Grove city limit and beyond the  County's Urban Services Boundary (USB).  The hearing on the "Kammerer Road/Highway 99 SOIA"  is February 7 at 5:30 pm at 700 H Street, Sacramento Before then, please send your thoughts to the LAFCo Commissioners who will make this decision that an expanded Sphere of Influence (SOI) for Elk Grove is wrong.  

You can do this by simply emailing commissionclerk@saclafco.org.  Be sure to include your name and address.  Key issues to write about are below.

You can review the issues background and what FOSH and ECOS and Habitat 2020 have said here:  http://www.swainsonshawk.org/Kammerer99.html

In 1993 the Sacramento County adopted an Urban Services Boundary (USB) to protect farmland against sprawl development.  The developer of Kammerer/Highway 99 SOIA wants LAFCo to authorize 1158 acres beyond the USB, despite thousands of undeveloped acres of vacant land inside the USB and City of Elk Grove.

What is your Hot Button?

Protection of farmland?   Tthe Sacramento County Farm Bureau has opposed approval of this project because of the loss of farmland and other impacts on agriculture that would result.  The EIR finds the approval of Kammerer/99 SOIA would have  significant and unavoidable (can't mitigate for) impacts on farmland.  See http://www.swainsonshawk.org/Images/Significantunavoidable.pdf  for a list of the 14 different significant impacts that can't be mitigated.

Endangered wildlife?  The EIR for this proposal finds significant, unavoidable and unmitigatable impacts on wildlife if this project is approved.  An approval will signal that decisionmakers will sacrifice the success of the South Sacramento County Habitat Conservation Plan, intended to mitigate for the loss of wildlife habitat inside the USB.

Adequate Water Supply for the Future? The Sacramento County Water Agency has stated that all available water has been allocated for existing and future development within the USB. The Sacramento County General Plan states that more development is presently planned in the County than can be served by water supply.  Yet this proposal will either further drain the groundwater supply already depleted in the South area, or take water intended for other projects, long ago entitled.  The EIR states that depletion of groundwater supplies is a significant and unavoidable impact of an approval of this proposal.

Climate change?  Our Climate Action Plan depends on sticking with the adopted Metropolitan Transportation Plan (SACOG's MTP) and its strategy for curbing vehicle trips.  The MTP assumes Elk Grove stays within its current boundaries until at least 2036.  SACOG has told LAFCo that the Kammerer/99 proposal is outside the MTP footprint.

Urban Sprawl?  The proposal is the very definition of urban sprawl --approving farmland for urban use while adequate land supply already exists within the urban area for expected growth.  LAFCos are mandated to curb urban sprawl and protect farmland by saying no to premature expansion of cities. (click here to see LAFCo's statutory requirements and policies http://www.swainsonshawk.org/Images/State Law and LAFCo Pol.pdf).  Tell LAFCo to do its job and say NO to the Kammerer Road/Highway 99 Sphere of Infuence.

Smart Transportation? The proposed east-west Southeast Connector is planned to allow east-west traffic (particularly trucks) to bypass the Sacramento urban area by linking highways I-5, 99, and 50 south of the urban area.  Allowing Elk Grove to strip-develop along this roadway will take away the intended transportation efficiency.  

No comments:

Post a Comment

One of the objects if this blog is to elevate civil discourse. Please do your part by presenting arguments rather than attacks or unfounded accusations.